The part that suprised me the most, and sickens me, was that they wont mediate conflicts between their livers and that they wont take responsability of any damage because the lack of management…written in the f*kin contract!!! THAT F*KIN REFORCES MANY RRATS, SPECULATIONS AND CONFIRMS HOW EASILY IS FOR THE CREATION OF A TOXIC WORK ENVIRONMENT!!!!! This almost cost a life and god knows what many more were or are in danger…
by LastDem
15 Comments
[Divide and conquer type strategy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy_in_the_workplace)
>While psychopaths typically represent a very small percentage of workplace staff, the presence of psychopathy in the workplace, especially within senior management, can do enormous damage. Indeed, psychopaths are usually most present at higher levels of corporate structure, and their actions often cause a ripple effect throughout an organization, setting the tone for an entire corporate culture. Examples of detrimental effects include increased bullying, conflict, stress, staff turnover, absenteeism, and reduction in both productivity and social responsibility. Ethical standards of entire organisations can be badly damaged if a corporate psychopath is in charge. A 2017 UK study found that companies with leaders who show “psychopathic characteristics” destroy shareholder value, tending to have poor future returns on equity.
Anybody got an instant bingo on their card?
[deleted]
Yes, the biggest issue is even if you were to remove all the possible people who could’ve caused the past incidents, the workplace itself *creates* the situation.
The company *is* the problem.
That item you mentioned is what bothers me about the contract from a ‘is this real’ context. The issue is something called “Negligent Supervision”, explained [here](https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/negligent-supervision-lawyers.html). That provision seems to be trying to front run that by saying ‘Nuh uh, we specifically said that you can’t use that!’. Generally speaking, contract provisions that go against the actual law are unenforceable. Its a waste of ink to even print that.
Maybe there is no legal precedent like Negligent Supervision in Japan and its a standard clause over there. Thats all I can think as to why thats in there.
What amazes me is the clause that allows amending the contract at any time by Niji in combination with compulsion by Niji to get the livers to engage in social media. Technically they could amend the contract, force the liver to interact on social media (accepting the amendments de facto) and if they refused could justify them as refusing to fulfill their duties and terminate them. Basically they could amend the contract at any time and anyone who refused the amendments would have to pay the termination fee.
That’s not unexpected. Sadly, such contracts are not unusual for entertainment industry. As one man from from record label said “You give band money when there are no other things you can spend money on”.
>This almost cost a life
Almost cost a life *twice* and then also almost cost another life (technically afaik sayu’s problems were more with management and with fans than with coworkers excluding kotoka and finana but still, two separate people ended up attempting).
I cannot imagine how high on dopamine /vt/ is right now.
They’re eating good since the last few weeks.
Yes this is going on for at least a month now.
Friendly reminder to reditors – RRATS (that breach contaiment) are always right.
All nonsense rrats gets killed and buried in depth of 4ch to never be witnessed by outer internet and if you found rrat outside containment its 70% chance true.
The problem is that this contract is unconfirmed, that’s why I’m very curious about the music producer and his contract. Ghost Data is the closest to confirming that this contract is the real deal.
The more that comes out of Niji, the more 4chan is vindicated and the more the parrot cries.
Really explains the black screen stream 💀
The clique theory is slowly materialising for me…. Oh no, no, no,
The madder the rrat, the truer it is.
What is wrong with the contract. Are you to fake lawyer