Japan is quietly preparing the most pro-crypto shift of any G7 nation.
According to multiple reports from local media, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is drafting a sweeping reclassification of digital assets that would bring Bitcoin, Ethereum, and around 100 other tokens under the same umbrella as stocks and investment funds.
If the plan moves forward, Japan will treat these tokens as “financial products” starting in 2026, and with that comes a flat 20% tax, insider trading rules, and institutional pathways that could open the doors for banks, insurers, and public companies.
Why is Japan making the shift now?
For years, crypto in Japan has been operating in a regulatory gray zone. It has been tolerated, taxed heavily, and kept at arm’s length by the country’s most powerful financial institutions.
Under the current system, crypto gains are taxed as miscellaneous income, with marginal rates that can reach 55%. The shift to a financial-product status would reframe crypto as a peer asset to equities, rather than a speculative anomaly.
The timing here is deliberate. The FSA appears to be aiming for submission to the Diet in 2026, giving it a full year to finalize consultations, write legislation, and build a clear taxonomy.
The agency is learning from past failures (both domestic, such as the fallout from Mt. Gox and Coincheck, and global, like FTX and Terra), and rebuilding the crypto framework with institutional credibility in mind.
The proposed overhaul contains three essential components.
First, the tax parity: crypto holders of approved tokens would pay a 20% capital gains tax, the same as equity investors. That makes holding Bitcoin or Ethereum more attractive for long-term savers, corporate treasuries, and retail traders alike.
It also removes one of the most severe fiscal disincentives for Japanese residents to custody crypto domestically, potentially reversing years of offshore migration.
Second, the regulatory recategorization. Tokens like BTC and ETH would be reclassified under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), Japan’s core securities law.
That status triggers a raft of requirements, from issuer disclosures to insider trading enforcement, which signal to banks and brokerage arms that these assets now sit within their compliance perimeters.
If implemented as reported, these rules could authorize certain banks and financial institutions to offer crypto exposure directly to clients via affiliated brokerages or custodians.
Third, and perhaps most structurally important, is the gatekeeping function. The FSA is said to be curating a whitelist of roughly 105 tokens that meet the standards for classification.
This creates a bifurcated market: inside the regulatory perimeter, access to bank-grade custody, stock-like taxation, and institutional rails; outside it, tighter restrictions, limited exchange access, and a higher compliance burden.
For investors and token teams, this boundary could become a hard dividing line between what’s viable in Japan and what’s not.
A region takes notice
If Japan moves first on this front, it will be light-years ahead of its G7 peers in terms of regulatory clarity. But it won’t be alone in Asia. Singapore is already bedding in a new licensing regime that links tokenized deposits and stablecoins to card networks and banking pipes.
Hong Kong is piloting a tokenized green bond platform through the HKMA and giving banks regulatory room to handle digital assets via existing securities licenses. Korea, too, has launched a phased framework for crypto adoption among its largest corporations, with Samsung and SK exploring tokenized fund issuance and blockchain custody.
JurisdictionToken LicensingTax ClarityStablecoin RulesBank ParticipationInstitutional AccessJapan⚠️ In progress (FSA whitelist)✅ Proposed 20% flat⚠️ Early-stage⚠️ Conditional (2026+)⚠️ Pending legal changesSingapore✅ Live under PSA framework⚠️ No capital gains tax✅ Licensing + pilots live✅ Bank-linked products approved⚠️ Some constraintsHong Kong⚠️ VATP licensing live⚠️ Case-by-case✅ Stablecoin consultation underway⚠️ Under securities framework⚠️ Pilot-stageSouth Korea⚠️ Gradual rollout⚠️ 2025 tax law pending⚠️ Still forming⚠️ Limited⚠️ Emerging
Note: ✅ = in place; ⚠️ = partial or in progress; ❌ = absent. Based on public disclosures, 2025.
What sets Japan apart is that it’s tying everything to its domestic tax and disclosure rules. While Singapore and Hong Kong have focused more on custody, listing, and payment infrastructure, Japan is fixing one of the most decisive levers: after-tax returns.
If Japanese retail traders go from paying 55% to 20% on crypto gains, that could meaningfully tilt behavior. If banks and insurance groups are cleared to offer crypto-linked products under existing investment frameworks, that opens a path to institutional allocation that other G7 nations haven’t unlocked.
The effect on capital flows across Asia could be swift. Japanese exchanges could see higher net deposits as users bring assets home from offshore wallets. If local ETF providers get greenlit to offer Bitcoin and Ethereum vehicles, capital that had previously flowed to spot ETFs in the US might be repatriated.
Institutional treasuries that avoided crypto entirely under the old regime may begin to enter at the margins, especially if accounting rules and custodial infrastructure follow.
YearBear CaseBase CaseBull Case2025$0$0$02026$100m$300m$800m2027$150m$700m$1,800m
Source: CryptoSlate modelling for crypto fund inflows in Japan based on proposed Japanese FSA reforms. Scenario ranges reflect ETF approval scope and institutional adoption speed.
This also raises pressure on regional competitors. Singapore has long promoted itself as a crypto hub, but it taxes capital gains only because it doesn’t formally recognize them at the personal level. Hong Kong is still recovering trust after the JPEX scandal and faces political constraints.
Korea is watching closely; its 2025 crypto tax regime could be revisited if Japan’s model proves more effective. And the US is nowhere near consensus on how to treat digital assets under securities law or tax code, despite efforts made in the House and Senate.
CountryTax Rate (Crypto Gains)Asset ClassificationRetail AccessInstitutional AccessJapanUp to 55% (current); 20% flat (proposed)“Financial Products” for 105 tokens (proposed)Broad (via registered exchanges)Conditional (via brokers/banks under new rules)United States0%–37% (based on holding and bracket)Property / Some tokens as securitiesBroadGrowing via ETFs and custody channelsUnited Kingdom20%–28% CGT, varies by bracketProperty / Non-regulated for most tokensBroadLimitedGermany0% after 1 year; otherwise income taxPrivate Asset (long-term holding)BroadEmergingFranceFlat 30% on crypto gainsDigital Asset (under AMF oversight)BroadLimitedAustraliaCGT based on income/timingProperty / Digital AssetBroadEmerging
Source: National tax guidelines, local crypto frameworks (2025). Classification for Japan is proposed for 2026.
What this means for BTC, ETH, and SOL
The short-term impact for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana depends on execution. The FSA has not published a draft bill yet, and no official list of the 105 tokens has been made public. The political calendar could delay progress, or the asset list could be narrower than hoped.
But structurally, the direction is clear: Bitcoin and Ethereum are being slotted into the same legal and tax frameworks as mainstream financial instruments.
If the rules come into force in 2026, that would coincide with the likely second full year of US spot ETF flows, the maturing of Europe’s MiCA framework, and the rollout of stablecoin legislation in the UK. That convergence could produce the clearest regulatory environment crypto has ever had across the major developed markets.
But, it’s important to note that crypto in Japan isn’t being de-risked, but rather normalized through rulebooks. For institutions, that’s the safer path. For retail, the tax shift changes the incentives.
And for Asia, it means one of the world’s largest capital pools is setting a standard others will likely be forced to match. The next two years will define where, how, and under what rules capital will move when it does.
Mentioned in this article
AloJapan.com