The Okinawa prefectural assembly voted on September 18, 2025, to introduce a 2% accommodation tax on hotel and inn stays beginning in fiscal 2026, which starts in April. The measure will be the first prefectural-level lodging tax in Japan and is designed to raise revenue for tourism development and environmental protection. The levy will be capped at 2,000 yen (US$13) per person per night, with exemptions for school trips and extracurricular activities.
Officials estimate the new tax will generate approximately 7.8 billion yen annually. Revenue will be allocated to projects aimed at preserving Okinawa’s landscape, supporting employment in the tourism sector, and strengthening safety measures for marine recreation, which is one of the prefecture’s leading attractions. The decision comes as Okinawa seeks to capitalize on rising visitor numbers following the July 2025 opening of the Junglia Okinawa theme park.
First Prefectural-Level Lodging Tax
The tax represents a significant policy shift in Japan, where accommodation levies have typically been introduced at the city level. By adopting a prefectural framework, Okinawa aims to coordinate policy across multiple municipalities and ensure that revenues directly benefit the region’s tourism economy. Five municipalities — Ishigaki City, Miyakojima City, Motobu Town, Onna Village, and Chatan Town — have indicated they will align their own lodging tax systems with the prefectural scheme.
The ordinance passed unanimously in the prefectural assembly, accompanied by a supplementary budget to prepare for its implementation. Local authorities view the measure as necessary to balance the pressures of increased tourism with the preservation of Okinawa’s natural and cultural assets. The prefecture is one of Japan’s most popular leisure destinations, known for its beaches, diving spots, and subtropical climate.
Tour boats in Kabira Bay, a famous scenic spot on Ishigaki Island in Okinawa, Japan. Photo Credit: Yusei / Shutterstock.comIndustry and Community Reaction
While the assembly’s decision drew broad support, some hotel operators and municipal leaders expressed concerns over how the tax will be managed. At a symposium hosted by the Okinawa Convention & Visitors Bureau in Ginowan City, several mayors and hospitality representatives stressed that they would only support the levy if treated as a special-purpose tax. They warned they would not cooperate if the proceeds were diverted into general revenue rather than earmarked for tourism-related initiatives.
Industry groups also raised questions about the potential impact on budget-conscious travelers. Some warned that higher nightly costs could deter certain visitors, particularly domestic tourists or those staying in lower-priced accommodations. However, local tourism officials emphasized that the 2% levy, capped at 2,000 yen, is modest compared with other international destinations that impose similar taxes.
Despite these concerns, the ordinance reflects confidence in the resilience of Okinawa’s visitor economy. The prefecture recorded a sharp rise in arrivals in 2025, fueled by both domestic demand and a rebound in international travel. The Junglia Okinawa theme park has contributed significantly to this growth, positioning the prefecture to test new revenue models that support long-term sustainability.
Comparison with Other Japanese Jurisdictions
Okinawa’s move comes as more local governments across Japan consider accommodation taxes to manage growing tourism flows. Kyoto City approved a significant hike in its lodging tax, effective March 2026, raising the top tier to as much as 10,000 yen per person per night for premium accommodations. Osaka Prefecture is adjusting its own tax from September 2025 by lowering the threshold for taxable stays and increasing rates for higher-priced rooms, with projected annual revenues of about 8 billion yen.
Elsewhere, debates remain unresolved. Nara City has faced pushback from hotel operators who argue that a local tax could drive visitors to stay in neighboring jurisdictions. Shimane Prefecture declined to introduce a tax after concerns it would reduce overnight stays outweighed the potential revenue benefits. These cases highlight the balancing act between funding tourism infrastructure and maintaining visitor affordability.
Compared with Kyoto’s steep increases, Okinawa’s 2% capped tax is considered moderate. For example, a room priced at 8,000 yen per night would incur a tax of 160 yen, while a luxury room at 150,000 yen per night would be subject to the 2,000 yen cap, resulting in an effective rate of just 1.3%. This structure is intended to distribute the burden proportionally while preventing excessive costs for high-end stays.
The new tax will take effect in April 2026, following the start of the fiscal year. The prefectural government is expected to coordinate with municipalities and industry partners to establish collection mechanisms and ensure compliance. Authorities also plan to engage in discussions with hotel associations to address concerns and to clarify the allocation of funds.
As the first prefecture in Japan to introduce such a measure, Okinawa is likely to serve as a test case for other regions weighing similar initiatives. If successful, the program could set a precedent for balancing tourism-driven growth with sustainable management practices across the country.
With tourism accounting for a substantial share of Okinawa’s economy, the prefectural assembly’s decision underscores the importance of long-term planning. The tax is expected to strengthen infrastructure, protect the environment, and secure a stable workforce in an industry central to the prefecture’s identity and prosperity.
Top Photo Credit: Takashi Images / Shutterstock.com
AloJapan.com