How the Japanese GP proved wrong the myth that flat-out, low-degradation races are better for F1

The Japanese Grand Prix cleared up a misconception. A prevailing theory among certain subsections of the Formula 1 viewership is this: if Pirelli could simply make more durable tyres, then surely the intensity of races would reach stratospheric levels across their run-times. No tyre management, no sipping at the medium compound’s life like a hot, bitter espresso – just 20 drivers pushing each other until the chequered flag drops. 

The contrary view of this standpoint is that, if the grid is determined by speed over a qualifying lap, then surely 50-odd flat-out laps would largely preserve the order. One or two exceptions might apply owing to botched flying laps but, in reducing the impact of one of the greater variables – tyre degradation – the race loses a significant dimension.

In this article

Jake Boxall-Legge

Formula 1

Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics

Subscribe to news alerts